Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Applied Geochemistryarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Effects of light fraction organic matter removal on phosphate adsorption by lake sediments

Authors: Shengrui Wang; Wenli Yi; Suwen Yang; Xiangcan Jin; Guodong Wang; Fengchang Wu;

Effects of light fraction organic matter removal on phosphate adsorption by lake sediments

Abstract

Abstract The adsorption of PO 4 3 - on lake sediments has an important influence on the transport, degradation, and ultimate fate of P in lake ecosystems. Organic matter in sediment strongly affects PO 4 3 - adsorption, with light fraction organic matter (LFOM), the labile fractions representing only a small proportion of the total organic matter, playing a key role in nutrient cycling in lakes. However, little is known about the effect of LFOM on PO 4 3 - adsorption by sediments. This study examined the effects of LFOM removal on PO 4 3 - adsorption by lake sediments with different trophic status. Results showed that the removal of LFOM did not significantly affect PO 4 3 - adsorption kinetics, which was greatest during the first 0.5 h and reached an equilibrium state thereafter. The amount of PO 4 3 - adsorbed decreased due to LFOM removal from the sediments, especially in the first 0.5 h. The PO 4 3 - adsorption rates for the sediments from Gonghu Lake, Wuli Lake and Yuehu lake decreased from 302.44 mg (kg h) −1 to 138.93 mg (kg h) −1 , 322.88 mg (kg h) −1 to 149.21 mg (kg h) −1 and 415.36 mg (kg h) −1 to 46.77 mg (kg h) −1 , respectively. The removal of LFOM accelerated PO 4 3 - release from sediments to the overlying water, and PO 4 3 - adsorption efficiency decreased by 83.75%, 70.90% and 66.75% for Gonghu Lake, Wuli Lake and Yuehu Lake, respectively. Two plausible explanations contributed to the decrease, one was the replacement of PO 4 3 - which was in the form of Fe/Al-bound P in the sediment by OH due to the increased pH, and the other is the destruction of LFOM colloids by the carboxyl group ( COOH) and hydroxyl (–OH).

Related Organizations
Subjects by Vocabulary

Microsoft Academic Graph classification: chemistry.chemical_classification Hydrology Nutrient cycle Lake ecosystem Sediment Phosphate chemistry.chemical_compound Colloid Nutrient Adsorption chemistry Environmental chemistry Organic matter

Keywords

Pollution, Geochemistry and Petrology, Environmental Chemistry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Top 10%
Average
Average
moresidebar

Do the share buttons not appear? Please make sure, any blocking addon is disabled, and then reload the page.