Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions

Workflow for the Documentation of Questionnaires with Colectica Software for the Ethnic and Migrant Minorities Question Data Bank (EMM QDB)

Authors: Winn, Meredith; Saji, Ami; Morales, Laura;

Workflow for the Documentation of Questionnaires with Colectica Software for the Ethnic and Migrant Minorities Question Data Bank (EMM QDB)

Abstract

This technical note describest the workflow followed for both documenting and systematising the questionnaire metadata editing work undertaken with Colectica software (Designer and Questionnaire) for the Ethnic and Migrant Minorities Question Data Bank (EMM QDB). It was produced in the context of three research projects associated to the ETHMIGSURVEYDATA international research network between 2020 and 2022 and should serve as a baseline for future extensions of the EMM QDB.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Questionnaires, Metadata, https://vocabularies.cessda.eu/vocabulary/TopicClassification, DDI Lifecycle, Ethnic minorities, Surveys, Migrant minorities

7. Once satisfied with the Instrument and Study, ensure they are both attached to the 'EMM QDB Collection Series', following the guidance provided in the Colectica Designer Guide.

8. Once step 7 is completed, the questionnaire you have inputted and had concepts mapped onto is ready for publishing. However, the general rule is to send DDI 3.1 and 3.2 XML files of the updated EMM QDB Collection Series to Lucie Marie of the CDSP (lucie.marie2@sciencespo.fr) for publishing only when there are at least 3-4 new items ready for publishing. When these XML files can be sent to Lucie, drop her an email with the XML files. Lucie will then review these files before publishing; only when she approves these files with the updated version of the EMM QDB Collection Series, it will be made available on the public Colectica Portal.

1. Before importing the DDI, ensure that the language and agency are correct. If they are not, use Find & Replace to correct them within the XML document before importation into Colectica.

6. Publish the Instrument to the Pre-production Colectica Portal.

7. Re-open the Instrument in Colectica Questionnaires using Open from Repository.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 31
    download downloads 27
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
  • 31
    views
    27
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
31
27
Green
Related to Research communities
Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage