You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Borderline Humanities
Borderline Humanities
This chapter explores knowledge associated with the humanities that hasbeen developed in practice-oriented research domains of the Swedishgovernment to help solve societal challenges. I study the Swedish NationalDefense Research Establishment [Försvarets forskningsanstalt] (FOA). Theconcept of “borderline humanities” refers to research activities that didnot abide by academic distinctions between the humanities, the socialsciences, and the natural sciences. The study shows how knowledge onhuman culture, history, language, and beliefs developed in a researchenvironment that drew on diverse fields of both research and practice.The chapter brings to the fore shared themes and concepts betweendifferent research fields and draws attention to how this affects the viewof research impact. Part of book: ISBN 978-90-485-5502-4QC 20220815
civil defense, History, humanities impact, government, expertise, policy influence, Historia
civil defense, History, humanities impact, government, expertise, policy influence, Historia
68 references, page 1 of 7
Agrell, Wilhelm. Vetenskapen i försvarets tjänst: De nya stridsmedlen, försvarsforskningen och kampen om det svenska försvarets struktur. Lund: Lund Univ. Press, 1989.
Agrell, Wilhelm, Rickard Stankiewicz, and Jon Sigurdson. Svensk försvarsforskning i omdaning. Research Policy Studies. Lund: Research Policy Institute, 1992.
Agrell, Wilhelm. Svenska förintelsevapen: Utvecklingen av kemiska och nukleära stridsmedel 1928-1970. Lund: Historiska media, 2002.
Anderberg, Bengt. “Förord.” In Försvarets forskningsanstalt 1945-19,9e5dited by Ann Kathrine Littke and Olle Sundström, pp. 5-6. Stockholm: Probus, 1995.
Aronova, Elena, and Simone Turchetti. Science Studies during the Cold War and Beyond: Paradigms Defected. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
Baez Ullberg, Susann, and Per Becker, eds. Katastrofriskreducering: Perspektiv, praktik, potential. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2016.
Belfiore, Eleonora, and Anna Upchurch, eds. Humanities in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Utility and Markets. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Benneworth, Paul. “Tracing How Arts and Humanities Research Translates, C-ircu lates and Consolidates in Society: How Have Scholars Been Reacting to Diverse Impact and Public Value Agendas?” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 14, no. 1 (May 2014): pp. 45-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214533888.
Benneworth, Paul, Magnus Gulbrandsen, and Ellen Hazelkorn. The Impact and Future of Arts and Humanities Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40899-0.
Blomgren, Ebbe. Befolkningen under krig och kris: En beteendevetenskaplig diskussion. Stockholm: Huvudavd. 1, FOA, 1985.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!