Actions
  • shareshare
  • link
  • cite
  • add
add
auto_awesome_motion View all 3 versions
Publication . Article . 2020

Impact of the reference list features on the number of citations

Stefano Mammola; Diego Fontaneto; Alejandro Martínez; Filipe Chichorro;
Open Access
English
Published: 29 Oct 2020
Abstract

AbstractMany believe that the quality of a scientific publication is as good as the science it cites. However, quantifications of how features of reference lists affect citations remain sparse. We examined seven numerical characteristics of reference lists of 50,878 research articles published in 17 ecological journals between 1997 and 2017. Over this period, significant changes occurred in reference lists’ features. On average, more recent papers have longer reference lists and cite more high Impact Factor papers and fewer non-journal publications. We also show that highly cited articles across the ecological literature have longer reference lists, cite more recent and impactful references, and include more self-citations. Conversely, the proportion of ‘classic’ papers and non-journal publications cited, as well as the temporal span of the reference list, have no significant influence on articles’ citations. From this analysis, we distill a recipe for crafting impactful reference lists, at least in ecology.

Subjects by Vocabulary

Microsoft Academic Graph classification: History Impact factor Self citation Protocol (science) Bibliometrics Library science High impact factor

Subjects

Bibliography, Bibliometrics, Citations, Classic paper, Impact factor, Reference list, Self-citations, SELF-CITATION, AUTHOR, DETERMINANTS, INCREASES, PROTOCOL, ARTICLE, SCIENCE, TITLE, WEB, 113 Computer and information sciences, Library and Information Sciences, Computer Science Applications, General Social Sciences

Related to Research communities
Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage
moresidebar