You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Tracking Hunter-Gatherer Impact on Vegetation in Last Interglacial and Holocene Europe: Proxies and Challenges
Copyright policy )Tracking Hunter-Gatherer Impact on Vegetation in Last Interglacial and Holocene Europe: Proxies and Challenges
AbstractWe review palaeoenvironmental proxies and combinations of these relevant for understanding hunter-gatherer niche construction activities in pre-agricultural Europe. Our approach consists of two steps: (1) identify the possible range of hunter-gatherer impacts on landscapes based on ethnographic studies; (2) evaluate proxies possibly reflecting these impacts for both the Eemian (Last Interglacial, Middle Palaeolithic) and the Early–Middle Holocene (Mesolithic). We found these paleoenvironmental proxies were not able to unequivocally establish clear-cut differences between specific anthropogenic, climatic and megafaunal impacts for either time period in this area. We discuss case studies for both periods and show that published evidence for Mesolithic manipulation of landscapes is based on the interpretation of comparable data as available for the Last Interglacial. If one applies the ‘Mesolithic’ interpretation schemes to the Neanderthal record, three common niche construction activities can be hypothesised: vegetation burning, plant manipulation and impact on animal species presence and abundance. Our review suggests that as strong a case can be made for a Neanderthal impact on landscapes as for anthropogenic landscape changes during the Mesolithic, even though the Neanderthal evidence comes from only one high-resolution site complex. Further research should include attempts (e.g. by means of modelling studies) to establish whether hunter-gatherer impact on landscapes played out at a local level only versus at a larger scale during both time periods, while we also need to obtain comparative data on the population sizes of Last Interglacial and Holocene hunter-gatherers, as these are usually inferred to have differed significantly.
- Sapienza University of Rome Italy
- Uppsala University Sweden
- Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives France
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Netherlands
- Université Paris Diderot France
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere, Archeology, Holocene, Human-environment interaction; Holocene; Mesolithic; Neanderthal; Last Interglacial; Hunter-gatherers, Last Interglacial, Neanderthal, Archaeology, Hunter-gatherers, Human-environment interaction, Arkeologi, [SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment, Mesolithic
[SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean, Atmosphere, Archeology, Holocene, Human-environment interaction; Holocene; Mesolithic; Neanderthal; Last Interglacial; Hunter-gatherers, Last Interglacial, Neanderthal, Archaeology, Hunter-gatherers, Human-environment interaction, Arkeologi, [SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment, Mesolithic
8819
al Khasawneh, S., Murray, A., Thomsen, K., AbuAzizeh, W., & Tarawneh, M. (2019). Dating a near eastern desert hunting trap (kite) using rock surface luminescence dating. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11, 2109-2119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-018-0661-3.
Albert, R. M., & Cabanes, D. (2007). Fire in prehistory: An experimental approach to combustion processes and phytolith remains. Israel Journal of Earth Sciences, 56, 175-189. https://doi.org/10. 1560/IJES.56.2-4.175.
Allred, B. W., Fuhlendorf, S. D., Engle, D. M., & Elmore, R. D. (2011). Ungulate preference for burned patches reveals strength of fire-grazing interaction. Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10. 1002/ece3.12.
Alperson-Afil, N. (2017). Spatial analysis of fire archaeological approach to recognizing early fire. Cur - rent Anthropology, 58(16), 258-266. https://doi.org/10.1086/692721. [OpenAIRE]
Andermann, T., Faurby, S., Turvey, S. T., Antonelli, A., & Silvestro, D. (2020). The past and future human impact on mammalian diversity. Science Advances, 6. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb23 13.
Anderson, M. K. (2005). Tending the wild. Native American knowledge and the management of California's natural resources. University of California Press.
Anderson, D. G., Harrault, L., Milek, K. B., Forbes, B. C., & Kuoppamaa, M. (2019). Animal domestication in the high Arctic: Hunting and holding reindeer on the I͡Amal peninsula, northwest Siberia. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2019.101079. [OpenAIRE]
Anthropocene Working Group. (2019). Newsletter of the Anthropocene Working Group, 9.
Bailey, G., Andersen, S. H., & Maarleveld, T. J. (2020). Denmark: mesolithic coastal landscapes submerged. In G. Bailey, N. Galanidou, H. Peeters, H. Jöns, & M. Mennenga (Eds.), The Archaeology of Europe's Drowned Landscapes (pp. 39-76). Springer International Publishing.
Bakels, C. (2012). Non-pollen palynomorphs from the Eemian pool Neumark-Nord 2: Determining water quality and the source of high pollen-percentages of herbaceous taxa. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 186, 58-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.06.003. [OpenAIRE]
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).6 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).6 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
- Sapienza University of Rome Italy
- Uppsala University Sweden
- Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives France
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Netherlands
- Université Paris Diderot France
AbstractWe review palaeoenvironmental proxies and combinations of these relevant for understanding hunter-gatherer niche construction activities in pre-agricultural Europe. Our approach consists of two steps: (1) identify the possible range of hunter-gatherer impacts on landscapes based on ethnographic studies; (2) evaluate proxies possibly reflecting these impacts for both the Eemian (Last Interglacial, Middle Palaeolithic) and the Early–Middle Holocene (Mesolithic). We found these paleoenvironmental proxies were not able to unequivocally establish clear-cut differences between specific anthropogenic, climatic and megafaunal impacts for either time period in this area. We discuss case studies for both periods and show that published evidence for Mesolithic manipulation of landscapes is based on the interpretation of comparable data as available for the Last Interglacial. If one applies the ‘Mesolithic’ interpretation schemes to the Neanderthal record, three common niche construction activities can be hypothesised: vegetation burning, plant manipulation and impact on animal species presence and abundance. Our review suggests that as strong a case can be made for a Neanderthal impact on landscapes as for anthropogenic landscape changes during the Mesolithic, even though the Neanderthal evidence comes from only one high-resolution site complex. Further research should include attempts (e.g. by means of modelling studies) to establish whether hunter-gatherer impact on landscapes played out at a local level only versus at a larger scale during both time periods, while we also need to obtain comparative data on the population sizes of Last Interglacial and Holocene hunter-gatherers, as these are usually inferred to have differed significantly.