
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Arkæologi, filosofi og retorik
Arkæologi, filosofi og retorik
Archaeology, philosophy and rhetoric: A review and faculty opposition of Asgeir Svestads doctoral dissertation “Finn din egen filosof” (“Find your own philosopher”) presented at the University of Tromsø, Norway, February 2004. The dissertation critically examines an article by Lise Nordenborg Myhre and the doctoral dissertations by Johan Hegardt, Håkan Karlsson and Michel Notelid.
- LUNDS UNIVERSITET Sweden
Archaeology
Archaeology
20 references, page 1 of 2
• Binford, L R. 1989. Debating Archaeology.
• Hegardt, J. 1997. Relativ betydelse. Individualitet och totalitet i arkeologisk kulturteori. Occasional Papers in Archaeology 12 (Uppsala).
• Holtorf, C & Karlsson, H (eds). 2000. Philosophy and Archaeological Practice. Perspectives for the 21st Century.
• Hygen, A-S. 1996. Fornminnevern og forvaltning. En teoretisk og metodisk tilnaerming til planlegging og praksis i fornminnevernet. NIKU Temahefte 1.
• Karlsson, H. 1998. Re-Thinking Archaeology. Gotarc Series B, Gothenburg Archaeological Theses 8.
• Karlsson, H. 1999. Conversation in Front of a Megalith. A Contemplative Approach to Archaeology and Our Interpretative Existence. Current Swedish Archaeology 7.
• Myhre, L. Nordenborg. 1999. Metodiske refleksjoner. Primitive tider.
• Nicklasson, P. 1998. Recension av Håkan Karlsson, ”Being and Post-processual Archaeological Thinking.
Reflections upon Post-processual Archaeologies and Anthropocentrism” (1997). Fornvännen, årg. 93.
• Notelid, M. 2000. Det andra påseendet. En studie av övergångar i den arkeologiska disciplinens historia.
1 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!

Archaeology, philosophy and rhetoric: A review and faculty opposition of Asgeir Svestads doctoral dissertation “Finn din egen filosof” (“Find your own philosopher”) presented at the University of Tromsø, Norway, February 2004. The dissertation critically examines an article by Lise Nordenborg Myhre and the doctoral dissertations by Johan Hegardt, Håkan Karlsson and Michel Notelid.