You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Supporting Serendipitous and Focused Search
Supporting Serendipitous and Focused Search
People with complex information needs are for example Humanities researchers, who need advanced search engines to investigate their research questions. Much can be gained by combining research datasets, reusing tools and serendipitously discovering new insights for further research. Humanities researchers have different (large-scale) research datasets and tools, which are described differently with metadata. We present a highly interactive advanced search engine for Humanities researchers that semantically converges differently structured metadata records from different collections and institutions. It has features that support serendipitous and focused search in context based on the structure of the metadata used. This single system serves Humanities researchers by allowing them to search interactively across yet unexplored (research) data, discover patterns, locate relevant data for new insights, and find existing tools that could provide novel use cases.
- Designit (Norway) Norway
- Designfoods (Czechia) Czech Republic
- DesignSafe United States
- Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences Netherlands
- DESIGNAUSTRIA (DA) Austria
12 references, page 1 of 2
[1] P. Andre, m. schraefel, J. Teevan, and S. T. Dumais. Discovery is never by chance: designing for (un)serendipity. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition, C&C '09, pages 305{314, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[2] A. Barrett. The information-seeking habits of graduate student researchers in the humanities. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(4):324 { 331, 2005.
[3] M. J. Bates. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5):407{424, 1989.
[4] D. Broeder, M. Kemps-Snijders, D. V. Uytvanck, M. Windhouwer, P. Withers, P. Wittenburg, and C. Zinn. A data category registry- and component-based metadata framework. In LREC, 2010. [OpenAIRE]
[5] M. A. Hearst and C. Karadi. Cat-a-cone: an interactive interface for specifying searches and viewing retrieval results using a large category hierarchy. In SIGIR, pages 246{255, New York, NY, USA, 1997. ACM.
[6] M. Kemps-Snijders, M. Windhouwer, P. Wittenburg, and S. E. Wright. ISOcat: remodelling metadata for language resources. IJMSO, 4(4):261{276, 2009. [OpenAIRE]
[7] M. Kemps-Snijders, C. Zinn, J. Ringersma, and M. Windhouwer. Ensuring semantic interoperability on lexical resources. In LREC, 2008. [OpenAIRE]
[8] M. Lalmas. XML Retrieval. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2009.
[9] E. G. Toms. Serendipitous information retrieval. In DELOS Workshop: Information Seeking, Searching and Querying in Digital Libraries, 2000.
[10] M. Windhouwer. RELcat: a relation registry for isocat data categories. In LREC, 2012. [OpenAIRE]
1 Research products, page 1 of 1
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!