• Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage
• Publications close
• Conference object close
• Science Foundation Ireland close
• CSET CLARITY: Bringing Information ... close

Microblogs as a new textual domain offer a unique proposition for sentiment analysis. Their short document length suggests any sentiment they contain is compact and explicit. However, this short length coupled with their noisy nature can pose difficulties for standard machine learning document representations. In this work we examine the hypothesis that it is easier to classify the sentiment in these short form documents than in longer form documents. Surprisingly, we find classifying sentiment in microblogs easier than in blogs and make a number of observations pertaining to the challenge of supervised learning for sentiment analysis in microblogs.

Evaluation of sentiment analysis, like large-scale IR evalu- ation, relies on the accuracy of human assessors to create judgments. Subjectivity in judgments is a problem for rel- evance assessment and even more so in the case of senti- ment annotations. In this study we examine the degree to which assessors agree upon sentence-level sentiment anno- tation. We show that inter-assessor agreement is not con- tingent on document length or frequency of sentiment but correlates positively with automated opinion retrieval per- formance. We also examine the individual annotation cate- gories to determine which categories pose most di±culty for annotators.