- home
- Advanced Search
Filters
Clear All- Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage
- Publications
- ZA
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage
- Publications
- ZA
- Public Opinion Quarterly
Loading
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2015 Netherlands, South AfricaPublisher:Oxford University Press (OUP) Authors: He, J.; van de Vijver, F.J.R.;He, J.; van de Vijver, F.J.R.;doi: 10.1093/poq/nfv006
handle: 10394/20866
This paper investigates the integration of response styles (extreme and midpoint responding and socially desirable responding) and their effects on self-reports among 76,887 teachers from 18 countries in the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). Socially desirable responding (with a positive and a negative impression management factor) and 17 core constructs related to the teaching profession were measured with Likert scales; extreme and midpoint response styles were derived from these measures. Using factor analysis, a general response style was extracted with socially desirable and extreme response styles as positive indicators and midpoint response style as a negative indicator. This general response style was more strongly correlated with constructs of personal involvement, such as teacher efficacy and job satisfaction, than constructs with less personal involvement, at both the individual and country level; however, statistical correction for response styles had negligible effects on the size of cross-cultural differences and country rankings in any construct. We conclude that the general response style can be interpreted as response amplification versus moderation, and that there is no indication that correcting for the general response style increases the validity of cross-cultural comparisons of TALIS teacher data. (DIPF/Orig.)
North-West Universit... arrow_drop_down North-West University Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2015Data sources: North-West University Institutional RepositoryPublic Opinion Quarterly; NARCISArticle . 2015add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfv006&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 36 citations 36 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!visibility 481visibility views 481 Powered bymore_vert North-West Universit... arrow_drop_down North-West University Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2015Data sources: North-West University Institutional RepositoryPublic Opinion Quarterly; NARCISArticle . 2015add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfv006&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2012Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP) Authors: Shanto Iyengar; Gaurav Sood; Yphtach Lelkes;Shanto Iyengar; Gaurav Sood; Yphtach Lelkes;doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs038
The current debate over the extent of polarization in the American mass public focuses on the extent to which partisans’ policy preferences have moved. Whereas "maximalists" claim that partisans’ views on policies have become more extreme over time (Abramowitz 2010), "minimalists" (Fiorina and Abrams 2009) contend that the majority of Americans remain centrist, and that what little centrifugal movement has occurred reflects sorting, i.e., the increased association between partisanship and ideology. We argue in favor of an alternative definition of polarization, based on the classic concept of social distance (Bogardus 1947). Using data from a variety of sources, we demonstrate that both Republicans and Democrats increasingly dislike, even loathe, their opponents. We also find that partisan affect is inconsistently (and perhaps artifactually) founded in policy attitudes. The more plausible account lies in the nature of political campaigns; exposure to messages attacking the out-group reinforces partisans’ biased views of their opponents.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfs038&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 1K citations 1,398 popularity Top 0.01% influence Top 0.1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfs038&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2008Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP) Authors: Sue L. Mann; Diana J. Lynn; Arthur V. Peterson;Sue L. Mann; Diana J. Lynn; Arthur V. Peterson;doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn027
Our data collection procedure for young adult (YA) follow up surveys precedes the survey with a request to the parent for locator information on the YA. We tested how providing a token prepaid cash incentive to their parents would affect both parent response and subse quent (i.e., "downstream") survey response from the YAs. Parents were randomly assigned to one of three incentive conditions: $0 (N = 97), $1 (N = 98), and $2 (N = 97). We found strong evidence for a parent incen tive effect on parent response during the parent mail/phone sequence, and mild evidence at the end of the parent effort. We found no parent incen tive effect on final YA survey response. We did, however, find an effect on early YA survey response. For example, at 30 days following the ini tial survey mailing, YA survey response was 46.4 percent, 61.2 percent, and 58.8 percent for those whose parents received $0, $1, and $2, respec tively (p = .03). Also, we found that giving $1 or $2 to parents increased the speed of YA survey response by 34 percent (p = .02). We found no evidence for a differential parent incentive effect on the speed of survey response between female and male YAs. The increase in the YA survey response speed imparted by a $ 1 or $2 incentive to parents can more than
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfn027&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 7 citations 7 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfn027&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
Loading
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2015 Netherlands, South AfricaPublisher:Oxford University Press (OUP) Authors: He, J.; van de Vijver, F.J.R.;He, J.; van de Vijver, F.J.R.;doi: 10.1093/poq/nfv006
handle: 10394/20866
This paper investigates the integration of response styles (extreme and midpoint responding and socially desirable responding) and their effects on self-reports among 76,887 teachers from 18 countries in the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). Socially desirable responding (with a positive and a negative impression management factor) and 17 core constructs related to the teaching profession were measured with Likert scales; extreme and midpoint response styles were derived from these measures. Using factor analysis, a general response style was extracted with socially desirable and extreme response styles as positive indicators and midpoint response style as a negative indicator. This general response style was more strongly correlated with constructs of personal involvement, such as teacher efficacy and job satisfaction, than constructs with less personal involvement, at both the individual and country level; however, statistical correction for response styles had negligible effects on the size of cross-cultural differences and country rankings in any construct. We conclude that the general response style can be interpreted as response amplification versus moderation, and that there is no indication that correcting for the general response style increases the validity of cross-cultural comparisons of TALIS teacher data. (DIPF/Orig.)
North-West Universit... arrow_drop_down North-West University Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2015Data sources: North-West University Institutional RepositoryPublic Opinion Quarterly; NARCISArticle . 2015add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfv006&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 36 citations 36 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!visibility 481visibility views 481 Powered bymore_vert North-West Universit... arrow_drop_down North-West University Institutional RepositoryArticle . 2015Data sources: North-West University Institutional RepositoryPublic Opinion Quarterly; NARCISArticle . 2015add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfv006&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2012Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP) Authors: Shanto Iyengar; Gaurav Sood; Yphtach Lelkes;Shanto Iyengar; Gaurav Sood; Yphtach Lelkes;doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs038
The current debate over the extent of polarization in the American mass public focuses on the extent to which partisans’ policy preferences have moved. Whereas "maximalists" claim that partisans’ views on policies have become more extreme over time (Abramowitz 2010), "minimalists" (Fiorina and Abrams 2009) contend that the majority of Americans remain centrist, and that what little centrifugal movement has occurred reflects sorting, i.e., the increased association between partisanship and ideology. We argue in favor of an alternative definition of polarization, based on the classic concept of social distance (Bogardus 1947). Using data from a variety of sources, we demonstrate that both Republicans and Democrats increasingly dislike, even loathe, their opponents. We also find that partisan affect is inconsistently (and perhaps artifactually) founded in policy attitudes. The more plausible account lies in the nature of political campaigns; exposure to messages attacking the out-group reinforces partisans’ biased views of their opponents.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfs038&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 1K citations 1,398 popularity Top 0.01% influence Top 0.1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfs038&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2008Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP) Authors: Sue L. Mann; Diana J. Lynn; Arthur V. Peterson;Sue L. Mann; Diana J. Lynn; Arthur V. Peterson;doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn027
Our data collection procedure for young adult (YA) follow up surveys precedes the survey with a request to the parent for locator information on the YA. We tested how providing a token prepaid cash incentive to their parents would affect both parent response and subse quent (i.e., "downstream") survey response from the YAs. Parents were randomly assigned to one of three incentive conditions: $0 (N = 97), $1 (N = 98), and $2 (N = 97). We found strong evidence for a parent incen tive effect on parent response during the parent mail/phone sequence, and mild evidence at the end of the parent effort. We found no parent incen tive effect on final YA survey response. We did, however, find an effect on early YA survey response. For example, at 30 days following the ini tial survey mailing, YA survey response was 46.4 percent, 61.2 percent, and 58.8 percent for those whose parents received $0, $1, and $2, respec tively (p = .03). Also, we found that giving $1 or $2 to parents increased the speed of YA survey response by 34 percent (p = .02). We found no evidence for a differential parent incentive effect on the speed of survey response between female and male YAs. The increase in the YA survey response speed imparted by a $ 1 or $2 incentive to parents can more than
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfn027&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesbronze 7 citations 7 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/poq/nfn027&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu