Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Simple Search
Searching FieldsTerms
Any field
arrow_drop_down
includes
arrow_drop_down
Include:

Filters

Clear All
The following results are related to Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.
2 Research products, page 1 of 1

  • Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage
  • Publications
  • Research data
  • Research software
  • Other research products
  • Open Access
  • Article
  • 0509 other social sciences
  • 050904 information & library sciences
  • European Commission
  • IT
  • Scientometrics
  • OpenAIRE
  • Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Science and Humanities

Date (most recent)
arrow_drop_down
  • Publication . Article . 2020
    Open Access
    Authors: 
    Stefano Mammola; Diego Fontaneto; Alejandro Martínez; Filipe Chichorro;

    doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03759-0

    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Countries: Finland, Italy
    Project: WT | Understanding the genetic... (090532), NIH | Data Mgmt &Analysis Core ... (5U01NS069208-02), NIH | Randomized Clinical Trial... (1U01HG005157-01), NIH | A Center for GEI Associat... (5U01HG004424-02), NIH | CORE--ADIPOSE TISSUE BIOL... (5P30DK072488-02), NIH | THE BALTIMORE LONGITUDINA... (1Z01AG000015-30), NIH | Genetics of Early Onset-S... (5R01NS045012-02), EC | GEUVADIS (261123), NIH | Genome Wide Association C... (5U01HG004446-04), NIH | Research Training in the ... (2T32AG000262-06),...

    AbstractMany believe that the quality of a scientific publication is as good as the science it cites. However, quantifications of how features of reference lists affect citations remain sparse. We examined seven numerical characteristics of reference lists of 50,878 research articles published in 17 ecological journals between 1997 and 2017. Over this period, significant changes occurred in reference lists’ features. On average, more recent papers have longer reference lists and cite more high Impact Factor papers and fewer non-journal publications. We also show that highly cited articles across the ecological literature have longer reference lists, cite more recent and impactful references, and include more self-citations. Conversely, the proportion of ‘classic’ papers and non-journal publications cited, as well as the temporal span of the reference list, have no significant influence on articles’ citations. From this analysis, we distill a recipe for crafting impactful reference lists, at least in ecology.

    Average popularity
    Average popularity In bottom 99%
    Popularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.
    Average influence
    Average influence In bottom 99%
    Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.
    addAdd to  ORCID orcid 
  • Publication . Article . 2018
    Open Access English
    Authors: 
    Camil Demetrescu; Andrea Ribichini; Marco Schaerf;

    doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2945-x

    Publisher: Springer Verlag
    Country: Italy
    Project: EC | SecondHands (643950)

    We investigate the accuracy of how author names are reported in bibliographic records excerpted from four prominent sources: WoS, Scopus, PubMed, and CrossRef. We take as a case study 44,549 publications stored in the internal database of Sapienza University of Rome, one of the largest universities in Europe. While our results indicate generally good accuracy for all bibliographic data sources considered, we highlight a number of issues that undermine the accuracy for certain classes of author names, including compound names and names with diacritics, which are common features to Italian and other Western languages.

    Average popularity
    Average popularity In bottom 99%
    Popularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.
    Average influence
    Average influence In bottom 99%
    Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.
    addAdd to  ORCID orcid 
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Simple Search
Searching FieldsTerms
Any field
arrow_drop_down
includes
arrow_drop_down
Include:
The following results are related to Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.
2 Research products, page 1 of 1
  • Publication . Article . 2020
    Open Access
    Authors: 
    Stefano Mammola; Diego Fontaneto; Alejandro Martínez; Filipe Chichorro;

    doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03759-0

    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Countries: Finland, Italy
    Project: WT | Understanding the genetic... (090532), NIH | Data Mgmt &Analysis Core ... (5U01NS069208-02), NIH | Randomized Clinical Trial... (1U01HG005157-01), NIH | A Center for GEI Associat... (5U01HG004424-02), NIH | CORE--ADIPOSE TISSUE BIOL... (5P30DK072488-02), NIH | THE BALTIMORE LONGITUDINA... (1Z01AG000015-30), NIH | Genetics of Early Onset-S... (5R01NS045012-02), EC | GEUVADIS (261123), NIH | Genome Wide Association C... (5U01HG004446-04), NIH | Research Training in the ... (2T32AG000262-06),...

    AbstractMany believe that the quality of a scientific publication is as good as the science it cites. However, quantifications of how features of reference lists affect citations remain sparse. We examined seven numerical characteristics of reference lists of 50,878 research articles published in 17 ecological journals between 1997 and 2017. Over this period, significant changes occurred in reference lists’ features. On average, more recent papers have longer reference lists and cite more high Impact Factor papers and fewer non-journal publications. We also show that highly cited articles across the ecological literature have longer reference lists, cite more recent and impactful references, and include more self-citations. Conversely, the proportion of ‘classic’ papers and non-journal publications cited, as well as the temporal span of the reference list, have no significant influence on articles’ citations. From this analysis, we distill a recipe for crafting impactful reference lists, at least in ecology.

    Average popularity
    Average popularity In bottom 99%
    Popularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.
    Average influence
    Average influence In bottom 99%
    Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.
    addAdd to  ORCID orcid 
  • Publication . Article . 2018
    Open Access English
    Authors: 
    Camil Demetrescu; Andrea Ribichini; Marco Schaerf;

    doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2945-x

    Publisher: Springer Verlag
    Country: Italy
    Project: EC | SecondHands (643950)

    We investigate the accuracy of how author names are reported in bibliographic records excerpted from four prominent sources: WoS, Scopus, PubMed, and CrossRef. We take as a case study 44,549 publications stored in the internal database of Sapienza University of Rome, one of the largest universities in Europe. While our results indicate generally good accuracy for all bibliographic data sources considered, we highlight a number of issues that undermine the accuracy for certain classes of author names, including compound names and names with diacritics, which are common features to Italian and other Western languages.

    Average popularity
    Average popularity In bottom 99%
    Popularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.
    Average influence
    Average influence In bottom 99%
    Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.
    addAdd to  ORCID orcid 
Powered by OpenAIRE graph