Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Simple Search
Searching FieldsTerms
Any field
arrow_drop_down
includes
arrow_drop_down
Include:

Filters

Clear All
The following results are related to Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.
1 Research products, page 1 of 1

  • Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage
  • Publications
  • Research software
  • Other research products
  • 2019-2023
  • Article
  • 0509 other social sciences
  • 050904 information & library sciences
  • European Commission
  • IT
  • Scientometrics

Date (most recent)
arrow_drop_down
  • Publication . Article . 2020
    Open Access English
    Authors: 
    Stefano Mammola; Diego Fontaneto; Alejandro Martínez; Filipe Chichorro;

    doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03759-0

    Publisher: Springer, Budapest , Ungheria
    Countries: Finland, Italy
    Project: WT | Understanding the genetic... (090532), EC | GEUVADIS (261123), NIH | A Center for GEI Associat... (5U01HG004424-02), NIH | Genetics of Early Onset-S... (5R01NS045012-02), NIH | Data Mgmt &Analysis Core ... (5U01NS069208-02), NIH | GWAS of Hormone Treatment... (1U01HG005152-01), NIH | THE BALTIMORE LONGITUDINA... (1Z01AG000015-30), NIH | Genetic Risk to Stroke in... (5U01HG004436-02), NIH | ISGS: The Ischemic Stroke... (5R01NS042733-02), WT | A genome wide association... (084724),...

    AbstractMany believe that the quality of a scientific publication is as good as the science it cites. However, quantifications of how features of reference lists affect citations remain sparse. We examined seven numerical characteristics of reference lists of 50,878 research articles published in 17 ecological journals between 1997 and 2017. Over this period, significant changes occurred in reference lists’ features. On average, more recent papers have longer reference lists and cite more high Impact Factor papers and fewer non-journal publications. We also show that highly cited articles across the ecological literature have longer reference lists, cite more recent and impactful references, and include more self-citations. Conversely, the proportion of ‘classic’ papers and non-journal publications cited, as well as the temporal span of the reference list, have no significant influence on articles’ citations. From this analysis, we distill a recipe for crafting impactful reference lists, at least in ecology.

    Average popularity
    Average popularity In bottom 99%
    Popularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.
    Average influence
    Average influence In bottom 99%
    Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.
    addAdd to  ORCID orcid 
Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Simple Search
Searching FieldsTerms
Any field
arrow_drop_down
includes
arrow_drop_down
Include:
The following results are related to Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.
1 Research products, page 1 of 1
  • Publication . Article . 2020
    Open Access English
    Authors: 
    Stefano Mammola; Diego Fontaneto; Alejandro Martínez; Filipe Chichorro;

    doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03759-0

    Publisher: Springer, Budapest , Ungheria
    Countries: Finland, Italy
    Project: WT | Understanding the genetic... (090532), EC | GEUVADIS (261123), NIH | A Center for GEI Associat... (5U01HG004424-02), NIH | Genetics of Early Onset-S... (5R01NS045012-02), NIH | Data Mgmt &Analysis Core ... (5U01NS069208-02), NIH | GWAS of Hormone Treatment... (1U01HG005152-01), NIH | THE BALTIMORE LONGITUDINA... (1Z01AG000015-30), NIH | Genetic Risk to Stroke in... (5U01HG004436-02), NIH | ISGS: The Ischemic Stroke... (5R01NS042733-02), WT | A genome wide association... (084724),...

    AbstractMany believe that the quality of a scientific publication is as good as the science it cites. However, quantifications of how features of reference lists affect citations remain sparse. We examined seven numerical characteristics of reference lists of 50,878 research articles published in 17 ecological journals between 1997 and 2017. Over this period, significant changes occurred in reference lists’ features. On average, more recent papers have longer reference lists and cite more high Impact Factor papers and fewer non-journal publications. We also show that highly cited articles across the ecological literature have longer reference lists, cite more recent and impactful references, and include more self-citations. Conversely, the proportion of ‘classic’ papers and non-journal publications cited, as well as the temporal span of the reference list, have no significant influence on articles’ citations. From this analysis, we distill a recipe for crafting impactful reference lists, at least in ecology.

    Average popularity
    Average popularity In bottom 99%
    Popularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact.
    Average influence
    Average influence In bottom 99%
    Influence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact.
    addAdd to  ORCID orcid